EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-08/000415_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Mon Aug 21 23:15:42 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-09-02 | 3KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA103212142; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 23:15:42 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from mail.globalone.net (mail.global1.net) by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA102122096; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 23:14:56 -0700
Received: from shell.globalone.net ([e-mail] [198.69.121.31]) by mail.globalone.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id CAA29189 for <[e-mail]>; Tue, 22 Aug 1995 02:20:54 -0400
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 1995 02:20:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: [e-mail]
X-Sender: [e-mail]
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Mail problems
In-Reply-To: <[e-mail]>
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 21 Aug 1995, John Crookshank wrote:

> This last bunch of messages show the To: address as the actual poster
> instead of [e-mail], and they show the ReplyTo: address as
> [e-mail]. Some of these messages also show addresses with
> two webcom's in the address, ala [e-mail].

I noticed this too, but don't really have any control over what happens
in these fields....probably a good thing though, if I tried to fix this,
who knows what daemons I would have unleashed!  =)



> If I look at a couple of the new messages that DID get intercepted
> properly, I see headings of:
>
> Followup-To: Email
> Reply-To: [e-mail]
>
> These fields aren't present in the "bad" messages at all.
>
> I think these inconsistencies may be at least partially responsible for
> some of the mail list problems.

You're most likely correct....at least SOME of the problems have been
caused by these inconsistencies.  I know that WebCom has been making some
major changes over the last few weeks (months) and I was getting SERIOUS
amounts of error messages last week.  Things seem to be calming down a
good bit in the last few days, so I hope that whatever problems Webcom
was experiencing have been corrected.  Thanks for the info though!

Everyone please let me know if you start to experience some weirdness
again...I check the lists a couple of times each day so I'll most likely
see anything going wrong, but just in case....


                                     -David Warner
                                      The head muckity muck


--
[e-mail] sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]